The updated ESOS Act expands the government’s power to examine ownership links between providers and education agents. This falls under the strengthened “fit and proper provider” requirements.
Cross-ownership matters because it can create conflicts of interest, hidden commission flows, and unethical recruitment incentives.
The reforms aim to eliminate these practices to protect students and restore sector integrity:
- Oversee of onshore student transfers for financial gain
- Commission inflation
- Unethical incentives disguised as marketing or admin fees
- Manipulation of visa outcomes
- Low-quality recruitment pipelines
What Providers Should
- Identify Cross-Ownership Risks
- Document Everything
- Create Internal Governance Controls
- Be Transparent
Example Scenarios
Scenario 1 — Direct Ownership
A provider’s CEO owns 60% of an education agent business that recruits 300 students per year.
→ High regulatory risk
→ Must be declared, monitored, and documented
→ Commissions will be scrutinised
Scenario 2 — Indirect Ownership
A provider and an agent share the same parent company.
→ Regulators will investigate whether the arrangement influences recruitment decisions
Scenario 3 — “Invisible” Ownership
A director’s spouse owns the agent business.
→ Still cross-ownership
→ Still subject to scrutiny
How Educli Can Help Providers Manage Cross-Ownership Risk:
- Maintain ownership declarations for all agents
- Store conflict-of-interest registers
- Track commission patterns and anomalies
- Provide an auditable compliance log
- Flag risks under MD115
- Align with PRISMS agent data
#ESOSAct #MD115 #AgentCompliance #CrossOwnership #InternationalEducation #EducationIntegrity #CRICOS #ProviderObligations #ComplianceManagement #Educli #EdTechInnovation #AgentManagement