Ongoing debate about “Mickey Mouse” Courses

The term “Mickey Mouse courses” resurfaces in the media every so often, typically sparked by political discourse. So where is the catch?

Defining a “Mickey Mouse” Course

According to the rhetoric, “Mickey Mouse” courses are those where the content lacks the expected rigor, and the degree itself may not have significant relevance to the labor market. This perspective raises an important question: What constitutes a rigorous and relevant course? The government argues that courses leading to low-wage employment are not serving students’ best interests. However, this view oversimplifies the complex nature of education and its outcomes. Also, in regards to foreign education, the government calls Business, Management, and Project Management classes “Mickey Mouse,” but they shell out a tonne of money for the domestic students to take these same courses. 


It is essential to recognise that the curriculum for these courses is often guided by the government and enforced by registration bodies. This means that the content and delivery of these courses are not solely determined by educational institutions but are heavily influenced by governmental standards and regulations. While there are indeed some bad providers exploiting the system, the majority—over 90%—are committed to delivering quality education and adhering to regulatory standards.


The debate also touches on a fundamental question about the philosophy of education. Should the goal be to create independent learners or to transfer knowledge? An education system focused on fostering independent, critical thinkers may not always align with immediate labor market demands but is crucial for long-term personal and professional development. Conversely, a system narrowly focused on job-specific skills might limit broader intellectual growth.


For international education, fee-paying students should have the autonomy to choose their courses, especially if they plan to return to their home countries. The relevance of a course may vary significantly based on local job markets and cultural contexts. Students are often best positioned to determine which courses will benefit their future careers.


The issue of “Mickey Mouse” courses is not unique to one country; it affects many, including the UK, Canada, and Australia. Politicians often prioritise short-term polling preferences over long-term strategic planning. Rather than use term Mickey Mouse courses, one should discuss “Mickey Mouse providers” and those should be targeted  


Instead of dismissing certain courses as worthless, we should strive to create an education system that values independent thinking, adapts to diverse needs, and prepares students for a rapidly changing workplace.


#mickeymousecourses #education #internationaleducation #studyinaustralia #studyabroad