{"id":17778,"date":"2026-03-30T09:29:00","date_gmt":"2026-03-30T09:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.educli.com\/resources\/?p=17778"},"modified":"2026-03-30T09:29:04","modified_gmt":"2026-03-30T09:29:04","slug":"the-numbers-every-agent-should-be-reading-right-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.educli.com\/resources\/the-numbers-every-agent-should-be-reading-right-now\/","title":{"rendered":"The Numbers Every Agent Should Be Reading Right Now"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n\n \n
\n
\n Migration Agents<\/span>\n Built to RUN \u00b7 Issue 2<\/span>\n March 2026<\/span>\n <\/div>\n

<\/h1>\n

Student visa grants are falling. The 485 just got more expensive. Evidence levels are shifting. And the profession is about to change in ways most agents haven’t prepared for.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n
\n

Jan Karel Bejcek<\/p>\n

Founder, Educli | Published in Built to RUN<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

Welcome back to Built to RUN.<\/p>\n\n

In Issue 1, we covered the new Migration Agent Regulations that commenced 1 April 2026 \u2014 including the CPD changes, registration requirements, and what the transitional provisions actually mean for your renewal. If you missed it, the full breakdown is on the Educli blog: April 2026 legislative changes \u2014 full analysis \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n\n

This issue: the data that’s shaping your pipeline right now, what the GS and evidence level framework means for your daily practice, and two things on the horizon worth knowing about.<\/p>\n\n \n

\n

Student Visa Grants: The Pipeline Is Contracting<\/h2>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n
\n

709,437<\/p>\n

Student visa holders onshore<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n

\u221214%<\/p>\n

Applications FY2024\u201325<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n

\u221221%<\/p>\n

Applications FY2023\u201324<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n

83.1%<\/p>\n

Grant rate FY2024\u201325<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

That headline holder number looks healthy. It isn’t a reliable leading indicator.<\/p>\n\n

The stock of onshore students reflects enrolments from two and three years ago \u2014 a cohort that entered under a very different application environment. The grants data tells a different story.<\/p>\n\n

Two consecutive years of double-digit contraction in new applications means the pool of future graduates, future 485 applicants, and future permanent residency candidates is already smaller than it was. For agents whose practices focus on graduate and skilled visas downstream \u2014 the pipeline feeding your caseload is thinning.<\/p>\n\n

The grant rate improved to 83.1%, up from 77.8%. But a higher grant rate on a shrinking application pool means fewer visas issued in absolute numbers. The headline rate improvement doesn’t offset the volume decline.<\/p>\n\n

Full analysis with country-level grant rate data \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n\n \n

\n

The 485 Situation: 225,751 Holders and a Doubled Fee<\/h2>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n

Key changes \u2014 subclass 485<\/p>\n

\n
\n

$4,600<\/p>\n

Application charge from 1 March 2026
(was $2,300)<\/span><\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n

Age 35<\/p>\n

Maximum eligible age from July 2024
(was 50)<\/span><\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n

IELTS 6.5<\/p>\n

English requirement from July 2024
(was 6.0)<\/span><\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

There are 225,751 Temporary Graduate visa holders in Australia as at December 2025. That’s up from 89,000 in 2019 \u2014 a 154% increase over six years. The 485 population grew because student visa grants grew. Now those two trends are moving in opposite directions.<\/p>\n\n

The practical implication for agents: clients who would have lodged 485 applications without much hesitation are now doing that calculation more carefully. The fee is real money. Eligibility has tightened. And the post-study PR pathways those visas feed into have also become more competitive.<\/p>\n\n

The 485 isn’t disappearing \u2014 225,000 holders confirms it remains a major pathway. But the economics have shifted and client expectations need to be calibrated accordingly.<\/p>\n\n

Full 485 data analysis with historical trend \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n\n \n

\n

GS and Evidence Levels: What They Mean for Your Practice<\/h2>\n <\/div>\n\n \n
\n

Evidence Level 3 \u2014 from January 2026<\/p>\n

India \u00b7 Nepal \u00b7 Bangladesh \u00b7 Bhutan<\/p>\n

Higher documentation threshold \u00b7 Extended processing \u00b7 Intensified GS scrutiny \u2014 regardless of provider level<\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n

The Genuine Student (GS) requirement replaced GTE in 2024. If you work with student visa applications, you’re already familiar with the four questions in ImmiAccount. But the GS assessment doesn’t operate in isolation \u2014 it runs against an evidence level framework that determines the documentation threshold for every application.<\/p>\n\n

Two practical points for agents:<\/p>\n\n

Evidence level and grant rate are not the same metric<\/strong> \u2014 and can move in opposite directions. Bangladesh’s grant rate is around 30%, but the evidence level reflects a pattern of integrity concerns, not just refusal volume. Understanding the distinction matters for how you advise clients and set expectations.<\/p>\n\n

The GS statement is the most consequential document<\/strong> in a student visa application from a high-risk market. A templated or generic GS response isn’t just a weak application \u2014 it’s a refusal risk that reflects on the agent and on the provider. Individualised, specific, consistent with the supporting documents.<\/p>\n\n

Genuine Student requirement \u2014 full cluster on the Educli blog \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n\n \n

\n

Something I’m Building: The RUN Network<\/h2>\n <\/div>\n\n

One of the consistent themes in conversations I have with migration agents is isolation. Not professionally \u2014 most agents are connected to MARA, to CPD providers, to the usual industry channels. But operationally. When something goes wrong in a case, when a policy changes overnight, when you’re trying to figure out whether a decision you’ve made is the right one \u2014 there’s often nowhere to go.<\/p>\n\n

I’m in the early stages of building a practitioners’ network for migration agents. Small, closed, invitation-only. The working name is the RUN Network.<\/p>\n\n

The intention is not a forum or a Facebook group. It’s a small, curated community \u2014 agents with serious practices who want to think about the profession differently. Case discussions, operational frameworks, shared intelligence on policy shifts, and the kind of peer conversation that the standard industry channels don’t provide.<\/p>\n\n

If this is something you’d want to be part of \u2014 reply to this edition and tell me. I’m gauging genuine interest before I build the structure around it.<\/p>\n\n \n

\n

AI in Your Practice: Where It Actually Helps<\/h2>\n <\/div>\n\n

AI tools are everywhere in the conversation about migration practice right now. Here’s my honest read rather than a pitch.<\/p>\n\n \n

\n
\n

Where AI helps<\/p>\n

Research and synthesis.<\/strong> Compressing an hour of policy reading into ten minutes of checking. The agent still verifies \u2014 but the starting point is faster.<\/p>\n

Client communication drafting.<\/strong> First drafts of cover letters, visa condition explanations, consultation summaries. You’re editing, not writing from scratch.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n

\n

Where AI doesn’t help<\/p>\n

Legal judgment, risk assessment, reading the actual file. The case strategy decision \u2014 whether to lodge, how to frame a complex personal history, whether the evidence is sufficient \u2014 that stays with the agent. Tools like Educli are designed to support that judgment, not replace it.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n

The agents most affected by AI in the next three years won’t be the ones using it imperfectly. They’ll be the ones not using it at all, while their peers compress non-billable time and redeploy it into client capacity.<\/p>\n\n \n

\n

A personal note<\/p>\n

I’ve been a migration agent. I’ve run a CRICOS education provider. I’ve sat on both sides of the table in exactly the kinds of cases this newsletter covers.<\/p>\n

I built Educli because I couldn’t find a practice management platform that understood what running a compliant migration practice actually requires. Not just case tracking \u2014 the regulatory logic, the workflow discipline, the compliance scaffolding that lets you take on more work without adding risk.<\/p>\n

Built to RUN exists for the same reason. Not to sell you software in every issue. To give serious agents a publication worth reading \u2014 one that treats the profession with the technical respect it deserves.<\/p>\n

If there’s a topic you want covered, a question worth unpacking, or a policy change you want me to look at through the RUN lens \u2014 reply to this. I read every response.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Jan Karel Bejcek
Founder, Educli | @jankarelbejcek<\/span><\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

\n

Further reading<\/p>\n