The commission flow is reversing
The Commission Flow Is Reversing. Has the Fallout Started?
Why providers are sending emails that change the fee collection model — and what the TPS liability gap means for the sector
Colleges are sending emails to agents. The message is unambiguous: fees must now be paid directly to the provider in full. No more agents collecting fees and remitting later.
For years, some offshore agents operated as de facto fee collectors — holding student funds, taking commission off the top, and forwarding the balance. That model is now being widely undone. And here the conversation gets uncomfortable.
The provider didn’t hold the money. But they carry the debt.
When a student visa is refused, a refund is owed. Under TPS, the obligation sits with the registered provider — not the agent. But if the offshore agent collected the fees and the offshore agent doesn’t pay refunds, the provider is still liable.
This isn’t a hypothetical. It’s how the system has operated. And with the ESOS amendments now in force — including mandatory agent commission reporting — providers can no longer treat this as someone else’s problem.
The Tuition Protection Service obligation is held by the registered CRICOS provider. It does not transfer to the agent, regardless of who physically collected the fees or in which jurisdiction the agent operates. If a student is owed a refund and the agent doesn’t pay, the provider pays.
Who was ever the client?
This is the harder question the current shift surfaces. The power structure in a commission-driven fee-collection model is not what it appears.
The emails being sent right now are providers reclaiming control of their own balance sheet. That’s a reasonable response to a broken model. But it doesn’t fix the refund exposure still sitting offshore — with agents who are either unable or unwilling to honour obligations they were never formally required to hold.
Three things providers should address now
Audit your agent agreements for fee handling clauses
If your agreement is silent on who collects fees and in what order, you have no contractual protection when something goes wrong offshore.
Separate commission payability from fee receipt and commencement
Commission should only become payable once the provider has received cleared funds and the student has commenced study — not on the agent confirming enrolment.
Map your TPS exposure against current enrolled cohorts
If students are in the visa pipeline and fees were collected offshore under a collect-and-remit model, your refund liability may already exist.
TPS was designed as the student’s safety net. It was never designed for cases where the money left the country before the application was lodged.
Is this the first sign of fallout — or a long overdue industry correction?
The answer may depend entirely on whether your systems were ready before the emails started arriving.
Educli agent management
Track agent agreements, commission conditions, payment status, and compliance flags in one place. Know your exposure before it becomes a debt.
Take the free assessment →